&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Oct 07 2008

The Venereal Game

Published by ravyn at 12:00 am under On gaming, On writing, World-building Edit This

What I seek to introduce you to today is a game, but more than just a game. Once, knowing how its older members had played was necessary to sound wise in the relevant circles. Now, it is a pastime primarily shared by linguists and wordsmiths. In itself, it can serve as an excellent worldbuilding tool, granting color to local language without requiring the full effort of creating a new language.

Yes, as you may have realized, it’s not as dirty as it sounds. According to James Lipton’s An Exaltation of Larks, “venery”, from the Latin root ven, “to desire; to pursue” was a term most closely associated with the hunt. Terms of venery, then, were as important to the hunt as mechanical shorthand to the RPG community, or literary terms to writers; remembering them was a sign of being in-group, in the know, part of the culture.

What these terms are is essentially collective nouns. But unlike the rather generalized collective nouns we often use today, the idea was that each species had its own—you might refer to a murder of crows, but an unkindness of ravens. Due to their hunt roots, many of these terms of venery described game animals—but not all by any degree of the imagination. Lipton describes six ways these terms originate: Some are onomatopoeic, sounding like the sound the described creatures make (a gaggle of geese). Some are characteristic, describing attributes or tendencies of the subjects (a skulk of foxes)—this is most common. Some are based on appearance (a bouquet of pheasants). Some are habitat, one way or another (a nest of rabbits). Others are commentary, based on the observer’s point of view (a richness of martens, a cowardice of curs). And some, like “a school of fish”, are just cases of someone messing up when writing down the original term.

While the largest historical list of these charming phrases was The Book of St Albans, a 164-phrase collection published in 1486 and written by Dame Juliana Barnes, that doesn’t mean the venereal game ended there. It is still alive and flourishing. In fact, in the original edition of An Exaltation of Larks, Lipton asked his readers for further suggestions and received, as he put it, “a tidal wave of terms.” My personal favorite among these is “a helix of geneticists”, though I’m rather partial to “A metamorphosis of ovoids” and “a rhapsody of blues”.

How can we use this? The most logical use is worldbuilding. Venereal nouns lead to a more colorful language, which makes it sound more alive. Even if all we’re doing is using the existing ones, that creates a further element of the good old Middle Ages feel, when the choice was learn every single one of these or be thought a churl.

Another is to bring the poetry back to our language, and show off in the process. Yes, show off. The venereal game is one of wit—how amusing can we make our collective nouns?

Besides, I’m interested in a large-scale game. I’ve never done this with more than one or two other players, and that’s not near enough to get a proper exchange of ideas going. So—without suggesting any new terms yet (you’ll understand why soon, hopefully by the end of the week), who’s interested in playing the venereal game with me?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)
Advertise Here with Today.com

12 Responses to “The Venereal Game”

  1. Brickwallon 07 Oct 2008 at 4:34 am edit this

    My friends use one for “randomness(es)”, but it’s not really something I can say in public. It’s rather based on observances, though.

  2. ravynon 07 Oct 2008 at 11:14 pm edit this

    Brick: I may have to ask you later.

    Ishmayl: Excellent list! Care to toss out a few yourself?

    …come on, people, what’s with the silence? Doesn’t anyone else want to take a stab at it?

  3. LunarDJon 07 Oct 2008 at 11:17 pm edit this

    Stabbing? Wordsneakery? Count me in! *grin*

  4. X-manon 08 Oct 2008 at 1:17 am edit this

    Not sure I follow exactly what you’re after here but I’m intrigued enough to watch and see if I can’t pick it up. Word power is something I covet. Eloquence is the greatest art a man can pursue.

  5. ravynon 08 Oct 2008 at 1:22 am edit this

    It’s simple. We have a decent list of collective nouns–see Ishmayl’s link. We come up with our own. You’d be amazed at how many you can get from D&D alone–a silence of rogues, for instance. (My muse suggests “a grope of paladins”, because of Lay on Hands. The pallies themselves would probably rather be known as a blessing.) Right now, I’m just looking for interest–I have an idea, but I need to know if I’ve got enough people for it.

  6. X-manon 08 Oct 2008 at 11:58 am edit this

    Then I shall join your waffle of bloggers. One form my side of the world. A ground of Kiwi. A Kiwi is a flightless bird and one of our national symbols.

  7. ravynon 08 Oct 2008 at 1:42 pm edit this

    Excellent. This is a good start; I think I can put my next plan into action…

  8. Rebecca+on 09 Oct 2008 at 11:15 am edit this

    Random Question: Do you know if the “The Book of St Albans” have anything to do with the location (near the town of St. Alban’s) or the the saint himself? Purely curious really…it seems a rather strange name for the topic/information contained in the book.

  9. ravynon 09 Oct 2008 at 2:01 pm edit this

    Location of printing. If I’m reading Exaltation of Larks correctly, a lot of the Books of Courtesy, predecessors to said book, were also named for where they were published.

  10. Lianaon 14 Dec 2008 at 4:20 pm edit this

    I was doing some hand laundry when my boyfriend passed by and exclaimed, “Man! That’s a cr#p-load of bras”. This sent me off in search of the right term. The best I could come up with was “Clutch of bras” implying both to hold, and also a round clutch of goose eggs? Possibly “Load of Lingerie” is more exact. Any other suggestions could improve the game.
    Bras anyone?

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here
Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.